Ventilator calculator
Predicted body weight and lung-protective tidal volumes, driving pressure, P/F and S/F with ARDS severity (Berlin and the 2024 global definition), and the ROX index for high-flow nasal oxygen.
1Patient
2Ventilator optional
Plateau: 0.5 s inspiratory hold in a passive patient.
3Oxygenation optional
How it works
Lung-protective ventilation checklist
- Tidal volume by PBW, not actual weight. ATS (2017, retained in 2024): VT 4–8 mL/kg PBW and plateau pressure <30 cmH₂O for ARDS (strong recommendation). ARDSNet protocol: start at 8 mL/kg, reduce by 1 mL/kg at intervals ≤2 h to 6 mL/kg.
- Plateau pressure goal ≤30 cmH₂O (ARDSNet). Check at least every 4 h and after each PEEP or VT change. If >30: reduce VT by 1 mL/kg steps (minimum 4 mL/kg). If <25 and VT <6 mL/kg: increase VT by 1 mL/kg until Pplat >25 or VT = 6.
- Rate: set to approximate baseline minute ventilation, not >35/min. pH goal 7.30–7.45; if pH 7.15–7.30, raise RR (max 35); if pH <7.15 at RR 35, VT may be raised in 1 mL/kg steps (Pplat target may be exceeded).
- Oxygenation goal: PaO₂ 55–80 mmHg or SpO₂ 88–95%, minimum PEEP 5 cmH₂O (ARDSNet).
- PEEP: ATS 2024 suggests higher PEEP without lung recruitment maneuvers in moderate–severe ARDS (conditional) and recommends against prolonged recruitment maneuvers (strong).
- Severe ARDS: prone positioning >12 h/day (strong). Neuromuscular blockade in early severe ARDS (conditional). VV-ECMO in selected patients (conditional) — ATS cites P/F <80 mmHg or pH <7.25 with PaCO₂ ≥60 mmHg despite optimal conventional care, early (<7 days) in the course.
- Corticosteroids for ARDS: suggested (ATS 2024, conditional).
Formulas
Predicted body weight (ARDSNet protocol card)
Male: 50 + 2.3 × (height in − 60) · Female: 45.5 + 2.3 × (height in − 60)Metric form used in the 2000 ARMA trial: 50 (or 45.5) + 0.91 × (height cm − 152.4). The two differ by <0.2 kg across adult heights; this tool uses the protocol-card inch form (cm ÷ 2.54).
Driving pressure
ΔP = plateau pressure − PEEP (total PEEP if auto-PEEP measured)Oxygenation ratios — FiO₂ as a fraction (0.21–1.0)
P/F = PaO₂ (mmHg) ÷ FiO₂ · S/F = SpO₂ (%) ÷ FiO₂ · ROX = (SpO₂ ÷ FiO₂) ÷ RR1 kPa = 7.50062 mmHg.
ARDS severity thresholds
| Severity | P/F (mmHg) | S/F (SpO₂ ≤97%) |
|---|---|---|
| Mild | >200 to ≤300 | >235 to ≤315 |
| Moderate | >100 to ≤200 | >148 to ≤235 |
| Severe | ≤100 | ≤148 |
Berlin (2012): P/F bands above with PEEP or CPAP ≥5 cmH₂O (CPAP allowed for mild only). Global definition (2024): intubated ARDS uses the P/F or S/F bands above with PEEP ≥5; non-intubated ARDS requires P/F ≤300 or S/F ≤315 on high-flow ≥30 L/min or NIV/CPAP ≥5 cmH₂O, without severity grading. S/F is not valid above SpO₂ 97% or with suspected hemoglobin abnormality (CO, methemoglobin). Measure ≥30 min after changes in position, FiO₂ or flow.
Oxygenation is one criterion only: both definitions also require onset within 1 week, bilateral opacities (global definition also accepts ultrasound) and respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload.
ROX index thresholds (Roca 2019)
| Time on HFNC | Predicts failure | Lower risk of intubation |
|---|---|---|
| 2 h | <2.85 | ≥4.88 |
| 6 h | <3.47 | ≥4.88 |
| 12 h | <3.85 | ≥4.88 |
Validated in 191 adults with pneumonia on high-flow nasal cannula (35.6% intubated). Discrimination was modest (AUROC 0.68 at 2 h to 0.76 at 12 h). Values between the cutoffs are indeterminate — repeat the measurement. A trend that fails to rise over 12 h was associated with failure.
ARDSNet PEEP/FiO₂ tables
From the ARDSNet protocol card. Optional incremental combinations to reach the oxygenation goal; not required by the protocol.
Lower PEEP / higher FiO₂
| FiO₂ | PEEP |
|---|---|
| 0.3 | 5 |
| 0.4 | 5 |
| 0.4 | 8 |
| 0.5 | 8 |
| 0.5 | 10 |
| 0.6 | 10 |
| 0.7 | 10 |
| 0.7 | 12 |
| 0.7 | 14 |
| 0.8 | 14 |
| 0.9 | 14 |
| 0.9 | 16 |
| 0.9 | 18 |
| 1.0 | 18–24 |
Higher PEEP / lower FiO₂
| FiO₂ | PEEP |
|---|---|
| 0.3 | 5 |
| 0.3 | 8 |
| 0.3 | 10 |
| 0.3 | 12 |
| 0.3 | 14 |
| 0.4 | 14 |
| 0.4 | 16 |
| 0.5 | 16 |
| 0.5 | 18 |
| 0.5–0.8 | 20 |
| 0.8 | 22 |
| 0.9 | 22 |
| 1.0 | 22 |
| 1.0 | 24 |
Pitfalls
- Use PBW, never actual weight. Lung size tracks height and sex. A 120 kg, 165 cm woman has a PBW of about 57 kg — 6 mL/kg is ~340 mL, not 720 mL.
- Measure height. Every inch (2.54 cm) of error moves PBW by 2.3 kg — about 14 mL of tidal volume at 6 mL/kg.
- Plateau and driving pressure need a passive patient and an inspiratory hold. Active effort makes both unreliable.
- Driving pressure target is observational. Lower ΔP tracked with survival in secondary analyses (Amato 2015); no trial has proven that titrating to a ΔP threshold improves outcome. 15 cmH₂O is a proposed safety limit, not a validated target.
- S/F above SpO₂ 97% is meaningless — the oxyhemoglobin curve is flat. Pulse oximetry can overestimate saturation, more often in patients with darker skin; get an ABG when the category would change management.
- ROX is for high-flow nasal cannula, derived in pneumonia. It informs, not dictates, the timing of intubation.
Sources
- NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network. Mechanical ventilation protocol summary (protocol card) and PBW/tidal volume tables. ardsnet.org.
- ARDS Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and ARDS. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–8.
- Qadir N, Sahetya S, Munshi L, et al. An update on management of adult patients with ARDS: an official ATS clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024;209(1):24–36. doi:10.1164/rccm.202311-2011ST
- Matthay MA, Arabi Y, Arroliga AC, et al. A new global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024;209(1):37–47. doi:10.1164/rccm.202303-0558WS
- ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526–33. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5669
- Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747–55. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1410639
- Bugedo G, Retamal J, Bruhn A. Driving pressure: a marker of severity, a safety limit, or a goal for mechanical ventilation? Crit Care 2017;21:199. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1779-x
- Roca O, Caralt B, Messika J, et al. An index combining respiratory rate and oxygenation to predict outcome of nasal high-flow therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:1368–76. doi:10.1164/rccm.201803-0589OC
Educational reference only — not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or specialist advice. Calculations run in your browser; nothing you enter is sent or stored.