Eosinophilia: workup and management
Adults with a raised eosinophil count: band the count, decide whether hypereosinophilia and HES criteria are met, and get the workup and management that fit the pattern. Strongyloides, cardiac, HES, DRESS and EGPA safety lines show on every screen.
1Eosinophil count
WBC × % is rounded to a whole number of cells/µL before banding. Changing the entry mode clears the count.
2Timing
How long has eosinophilia been present?
Earlier count also ≥1.5 ×10⁹/L (1,500/µL)?Persistence needs 2 counts: ≥2 weeks apart (2023, used here), ≥4 weeks apart (2011).
Biopsy shows tissue hypereosinophilia? Optional. Eosinophils over 20% of nucleated cells in a marrow trephine section, extensive infiltration in the pathologist's opinion, or extensive granule-protein deposition.
3Symptoms and organ involvement
4Exposures
Lived in or travelled to the tropics, subtropics or another Strongyloides-endemic area?Any time, including years ago.
Time in West or Central Africa (Loa loa areas)?
Loa loa assessment Blood smears for microfilariae, timed for the species
Started a new drug before the eosinophilia?Prescribed, over the counter, supplement or herbal remedy
DRESS red flags present?
Raw or undercooked meat, fish, snails or watercress?
5Context
Immunocompromised?HIV, HTLV-1, transplant or GVHD, chemotherapy, or high-dose steroids already given
Steroids or other immunosuppression
Pregnant?Needed before an ivermectin or imatinib regimen is shown.
6Results so far optional — blank means not known
Strongyloides serology
FIP1L1::PDGFRA (blood FISH or nested RT-PCR)
How it works
Definitions, and which source states each
| Term | Definition and source |
|---|---|
| Normal count | 0.05–0.5 ×10⁹/L [V12]. Eosinophilia: above 0.5 ×10⁹/L [ICOG23 §3; BSH17]. |
| Bands | Mild 0.5 to under 1.5; moderate hypereosinophilia 1.5 to 5.0; severe over 5.0 ×10⁹/L. The source writes these as 0.5–1.49, 1.5–5.0 and above 5.0 [ICOG23 §3]. The 2011 paper used mild, marked and massive [V12]. |
| Blood HE — used here | ≥1.5 ×10⁹/L on two examinations at least 2 weeks apart [ICOG23 Table 1]. |
| Blood HE — alternatives | 2011 consensus: marked eosinophilia on at least 2 occasions at least 4 weeks apart. The interval is waived when HE-related organ dysfunction needs immediate treatment [V12]. WHO 2022: sustained HE over 4 weeks for CEL, down from 6 months [WHO22]. ICC 2022: CEL and idiopathic HES need eosinophils ≥1.5 ×10⁹/L and ≥10% of WBC. For idiopathic HES the HE should be persistent, preferably for at least 6 months when documentation is available [ICC22 Tables 7–8]. |
| Tissue HE (2011 definition) | Any of: eosinophils over 20% of nucleated cells in marrow sections; extensive infiltration in the pathologist's opinion; extensive granule-protein deposition. In 2011 this counted as HE on its own [V12]. In 2023 it is separate from blood HE [ICOG23 Table 1]. |
| HES (ICOG-EO 2023) | All three: blood HE criteria met; organ damage or dysfunction attributable to tissue HE; other causes excluded as the main reason. Tissue HE with organ damage but without blood HE is tissue-restricted HES [ICOG23 Table 1]. |
| Idiopathic HES (ICC 2022) | All six: persistent HE (≥1.5 and ≥10%); organ damage from tissue eosinophils; no reactive, autoimmune or neoplastic cause; lymphocyte-variant HES excluded; marrow normal except for eosinophils; no clonal abnormality (CHIP caveat). Without organ damage the same picture is HE of uncertain significance [ICC22 Table 8]. |
| CEL, NOS (ICC 2022) | All six: HE (≥1.5 and ≥10%); blasts under 20%; no TK fusion (BCR::ABL1, other ABL1, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2, FLT3); not another MPN, CMML or SM; abnormal marrow (dysplastic megakaryocytes, often fibrosis) or raised blasts; a clonal abnormality [ICC22 Table 7]. In CML or AML, HE also needs ≥10% eosinophils [ICOG23 Table 1 footnote]. |
Boundary choices
1.5 ×10⁹/L: the 2011 paper writes marked eosinophilia as ">1.5"; the 2023 Table 1 writes HE as "≥1.5". The tool uses ≥1.5, the more cautious reading.
0.5 ×10⁹/L: eosinophilia is ">0.5", but the mild band starts at 0.5. The tool counts 500/µL as mild eosinophilia, the cautious reading.
5.0 ×10⁹/L: the source is explicit: moderate is 1.5–5.0 and severe is above 5.0. So 5,000/µL is moderate and 5,001/µL is severe.
Bands are judged on the count rounded to a whole cell/µL (3 decimals in ×10⁹/L). Toggling units changes only the display. BSH calls 0.5–1.5 ×10⁹/L "mild to moderate" [BSH17]; the tool's labels follow ICOG-EO 2023.
Strongyloides, ivermectin and Loa loa
Before steroids: check Strongyloides serology before corticosteroids or immunosuppression in anyone who has lived in an endemic region. If it is positive, treat before starting steroids [BSH17 Table III]. Serology can be falsely negative in immunocompromised patients, and stool microscopy is relatively insensitive [BSH17 Table III]. The tool treats an unknown immune status, and planned or started steroids, as immunocompromise. After a negative result in an immunocompetent patient, BSH Table III does not require cover before steroids (it asks for treatment when serology is positive). The exception is steroids needed now with a strong possibility of exposure, where the BSH text advises concomitant empirical ivermectin.
Steroids that cannot wait: patients on corticosteroids who are at risk of Strongyloides should get concomitant ivermectin [BSH17, grade 1B]. The BSH text gives 200 µg/kg/day for 2 days.
Treatment: the US label gives a single dose of about 200 µg/kg, with follow-up stool examinations. In immunocompromised hosts, repeated courses may be needed, for example at 2-week intervals; the optimal regimen is not established and cure may not be achievable [Label]. Get infectious-diseases advice.
Loa loa: heavy Loa loa infection can cause serious or fatal encephalopathy after a microfilaricide. After significant exposure to West or Central Africa, assess for loiasis before ivermectin and follow up carefully afterwards [Label]. Tests: filaria serology and day or night blood smears, timed for the species [BSH17 Table III].
Pregnancy and breastfeeding: the US label says ivermectin should not be used in pregnancy because its safety has not been established. In breastfeeding, treat only when the risk of delaying treatment outweighs the risk to the newborn [Label]. Albendazole may cause fetal harm; the label asks for a pregnancy test before prescribing it, and the tool shows no albendazole regimen [Label 5.2].
DRESS and EGPA
DRESS: in the prospective RegiSCAR series, the main features besides rash were eosinophilia (95%), visceral involvement (91%), high fever (90%), atypical lymphocytes (67%), mild mucosal involvement (56%) and lymphadenopathy (54%). Median onset was 22 days after the drug (IQR 17–31) [Kardaun13]. BSH puts onset at 3–6 weeks after a new drug [BSH17]. The 2024 Delphi consensus accepted immediate cessation of the culprit drug(s) for all patients. It recommends an ECG in all, with troponin and BNP only for suspected cardiac involvement, and EBV, CMV and HHV-6 viral loads in all. It treats any other organ damage as severe. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment; there is no consensus on dose, taper or duration [DRESS24].
The RegiSCAR score and the DRESS severity thresholds could not be checked in their primary text, so the tool shows red flags rather than a score.
EGPA: test ANCA in every patient with suspected EGPA. ANCA is detectable in 30–40%, mostly MPO-ANCA [EGPA23 statement 4, grade B]. The workup should cover heart, lung, skin, kidney and nerve involvement [EGPA23 statement 3, grade C]. The 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria score a patient already diagnosed with small- or medium-vessel vasculitis. Points are: eosinophils ≥1 ×10⁹/L +5, obstructive airway disease +3, nasal polyps +3, extravascular eosinophil-predominant inflammation +2, mononeuritis multiplex or motor neuropathy +1, cANCA or PR3-ANCA −3, hematuria −1. A total of 6 or more classifies EGPA [ACR/EULAR22]. These are classification criteria, not diagnostic criteria.
Not covered here
- Children and adolescents. The tool is for adults only.
- Pregnancy, beyond the ivermectin and imatinib holds.
- Kidney or liver dose adjustment. Imatinib: 50% lower starting dose at creatinine clearance 20–39 mL/min, and hepatic steps [Label 2.12]. Check every label.
- EGPA treatment, including mepolizumab for EGPA, which is a separate indication [Label 1.4]. Refer to rheumatology.
- Myeloid neoplasms other than FIP1L1::PDGFRA: PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2 and FLT3 fusions; CEL; systemic mastocytosis; CML.
- Eosinophilic esophagitis and other primary GI eosinophilic disorders, ABPA, eosinophilic pneumonias, and drug-specific AIN.
- Strongyloides hyperinfection, and parasite regimens other than Strongyloides and schistosomiasis. Get ID or tropical-medicine advice.
- The RegiSCAR score, DRESS severity thresholds and DRESS steroid dosing.
- The UK British Infection Association travel-eosinophilia guideline (J Infect 2025;90:106328), which could not be opened reproducibly and is not used.
- Monitoring intervals for asymptomatic patients; no source used here sets one.
Sources
- Valent P, Klion AD, Horny HP, et al. Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes (Year 2011 Working Conference). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130(3):607–612.e9. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.019 [V12]
- Valent P, Klion AD, Roufosse F, et al. Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes (2021 Working Conference, ICOG-EO). Allergy 2023;78(1):47–59, section 3 and Table 1. doi:10.1111/all.15544 [ICOG23]
- Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, et al. International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Blood 2022;140(11):1200–28, Tables 7 (CEL, NOS) and 8 (idiopathic HES). doi:10.1182/blood.2022015850 [ICC22]
- Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia 2022;36(7):1703–19 (CEL section). doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1 [WHO22]
- Butt NM, Lambert J, Ali S, et al. Guideline for the investigation and management of eosinophilia (British Society for Haematology). Br J Haematol 2017;176(4):553–72 — key recommendations with GRADE, text, Tables III and V (accepted manuscript). doi:10.1111/bjh.14488 [BSH17]
- STROMECTOL (ivermectin) US prescribing information, Merck, revised 09/2024 (DailyMed setid 681888c9-af79-4b7d-ae80-c3f4f6f1effd): Dosage (strongyloidiasis), Warnings (Loa loa), Precautions (immunocompromised hosts), Pregnancy, Nursing mothers. [Label]
- GLEEVEC (imatinib) US prescribing information, Novartis, effective 07/2026 (setid 211ef2da-2868-4a77-8055-1cb2cd78e24b): sections 1.7, 2.8, 2.12, 5.7, 5.10, 8.1. [Label]
- NUCALA (mepolizumab) US prescribing information, GSK, revised 05/2025 (setid fefb887c-e4ac-431e-8893-e9d1a5a63fea): sections 1.4, 1.5, 2.1, 5.4, 5.5, 14.5. [Label]
- BILTRICIDE (praziquantel) US prescribing information, Bayer, effective 03/2026 (setid 34ce1cdd-648e-4f1e-8512-bf3d4cc22eb9): sections 2.1, 4. ALBENZA (albendazole) US prescribing information, Amneal (setid 1977a867-0ee1-44c0-8da3-fe59c48699f5): sections 1 and 5.2. [Label]
- Kardaun SH, Sekula P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): results from the prospective RegiSCAR study. Br J Dermatol 2013;169(5):1071–80 (abstract). doi:10.1111/bjd.12501 [Kardaun13]
- Brüggen MC, Walsh S, Ameri MM, et al. Management of adult patients with DRESS: a Delphi-based international consensus. JAMA Dermatol 2024;160(1):37–44 (discussion text). doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4450 [DRESS24]
- Grayson PC, Ponte C, Suppiah R, et al. 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81(3):309–14 (abstract). doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221794 [ACR/EULAR22]
- Emmi G, Bettiol A, Gelain E, et al. Evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023;19(6):378–93, statements 3 (grade C) and 4 (grade B). doi:10.1038/s41584-023-00958-w [EGPA23]
- Secondary (case-based reviews, used only where labelled): Bass J, Klion AD. Eosinophilic cardiac involvement. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2025;13(10):2867–2869.e21. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.030. Wetzler L, Klion AD. Pulmonary infiltrates with hypereosinophilia. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2024;12(2):530–532.e18. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.020. Shomali W, Gotlib J. WHO and ICC classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update. Am J Hematol 2024;99(5):946–68 (abstract). doi:10.1002/ajh.27287 [Secondary]
Educational reference only — not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or specialist advice. Calculations run in your browser; nothing you enter is sent or stored.