Cardiology · Calculator

Lipids & statin decisions

From a lipid panel to a plan: LDL-C by Martin/Hopkins and Sampson/NIH, PREVENT 10- and 30-year risk, then statin intensity, LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals, CAC and next steps per the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidemia guideline.

2026 ACC/AHA dyslipidemiaPREVENT-ASCVDMartin/Hopkins · SampsonReviewed Oct 2026

1Lipid panel

2Clinical status

Very high risk = ≥2 major events, or 1 major event + ≥2 high-risk conditions.

Major ASCVD events

High-risk conditions age >65, smoking and diabetes are read from other fields

Other conditions tick any, or “None of these”

3PREVENT inputs

Total cholesterol and HDL-C come from step 1. Validated for age 30–79 without ASCVD.

Optional — switches to the augmented PREVENT model

4Personalize & reclassify optional

Risk enhancers (Table 13)

Reference

LDL-C equations and when each fails

The 2026 guideline prefers Martin/Hopkins or Sampson/NIH over Friedewald and over direct LDL-C assays (other than beta-quantification) COR 1. Non-HDL-C should be reported with every panel COR 1. Nonfasting panels are fine; repeat fasting if nonfasting TG is ≥400 mg/dL.

Martin/Hopkins (mg/dL)

LDL-C = non-HDL-C − TG ÷ factor · factor from the 180-cell table below (TG stratum × non-HDL-C stratum)

Sampson/NIH (mg/dL)

LDL-C = TC/0.948 − HDL-C/0.971 − (TG/8.56 + TG × non-HDL-C/2140 − TG²/16100) − 9.44

Friedewald (mg/dL)

LDL-C = TC − HDL-C − TG/5
  • Friedewald underestimates LDL-C when TG ≥150 mg/dL, LDL-C <70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL, and cannot be used at TG ≥400 mg/dL.
  • The original Martin/Hopkins table was validated below TG 400 mg/dL; an extended version exists for 400–799 mg/dL (not implemented here). Sampson/NIH is validated to TG 800 mg/dL.
  • Above TG 800 mg/dL no calculated LDL-C is reported here: use non-HDL-C, apoB, or beta-quantification.
  • SI entry is converted with 1 mmol/L cholesterol = 38.67 mg/dL and 1 mmol/L TG = 88.57 mg/dL before calculation.
Martin/Hopkins 180-cell factor table

Median TG:VLDL-C ratio by stratum (Martin 2013). Rows: triglycerides (mg/dL). Columns: non-HDL-C (mg/dL).

PREVENT equations

Sex-specific, race-free equations for adults 30–79 without CVD, predicting 10- and 30-year risk of ASCVD (nonfatal MI, CHD death, fatal or nonfatal stroke), heart failure and total CVD. The guideline uses 10-year PREVENT-ASCVD for lipid decisions and 30-year ASCVD in ages 30–59.

risk = ex ÷ (1 + ex) · x = Σ β·term + constant

Terms: age (per 10 y from 55; 30-year models add age²), non-HDL-C and HDL-C in mmol/L (×0.02586; centered at 3.5 and 1.3, HDL per 0.3), SBP spline at 110 mmHg (per 20), eGFR spline at 60 (per −15), BMI spline at 30 (per 5; heart failure only), diabetes, current smoking, BP treatment, statin, and interactions (treated SBP, statin × non-HDL-C, age × non-HDL-C, HDL-C, SBP, diabetes, smoking, BMI, eGFR). Optional UACR (ln) and HbA1c (centered at 5.3%, separate terms with and without diabetes) switch to the augmented models; entering both uses the full model with social deprivation index set to missing.

Valid input ranges: TC 130–320 mg/dL, HDL-C 20–100 mg/dL, SBP 90–180 mmHg, eGFR 15–140, BMI 18.5–39.9, UACR 0.1–25,000 mg/g, HbA1c 4.5–15%. Values outside these ranges are not clamped — PREVENT is not calculated. Categories use the unrounded 10-year value (shown to two decimals when rounding would cross 3, 5 or 10%).

Validation of this implementation: all 768 coefficients match the preventr package (from Table S12 of Khan 2024), and 24 reference profiles from preventr's test suite (base, UACR, HbA1c and full models; both sexes; statin, smoking, eGFR, BMI and age variations) reproduce every published 10- and 30-year output to 0.1%.

Primary prevention by PREVENT category (LDL-C 70–189 mg/dL)
10-yr ASCVDStatinGoal LDL-C / non-HDL-C
Low <3%Health-behavior counseling COR 1. Ages 30–59 with LDL-C 160–189 or 30-yr risk ≥10%: moderate-intensity statin reasonable 2aNo category goal stated
Borderline 3–<5%Can be considered after a risk discussion; risk enhancers help decide 2a. If started, moderate intensity 2a. hsCRP ≥2 mg/L twice: high intensity can be useful 2a<100 / <130 2a
Intermediate 5–<10%At least moderate intensity; high intensity at the upper end COR 1<100 / <130 2a
High ≥10%High intensity, ≥50% LDL-C reduction COR 1. Not at goal: ezetimibe 2a; PCSK9 mAb or bempedoic acid 2b<70 / <100 2a

Indicated regardless of PREVENT category (ages 40–75): diabetes, CKD stage 3–4 (moderate-intensity statin ± ezetimibe), and HIV on stable antiretroviral therapy COR 1. Untreated LDL-C <70 and non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL without other risk factors: starting LLT is unlikely to reduce risk COR 3.

Risk enhancers (Table 13): premature ASCVD in a parent or sibling; higher-risk ancestry; high polygenic risk; chronic inflammatory disease; Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L (≥50 mg/dL); hsCRP ≥2 mg/L on more than one occasion; TG persistently ≥175 mg/dL nonfasting or ≥150 fasting; CKM syndrome; LDL-C persistently 160–189, non-HDL-C 190–219 or apoB ≥120 mg/dL; reproductive risk markers.

Secondary prevention and “very high risk”

Very high risk: ≥2 major ASCVD events, or 1 major event plus ≥2 high-risk conditions. Major events: ACS within 12 months, prior MI, ischemic stroke, symptomatic PAD. High-risk conditions: age >65, coronary revascularization, current smoking, diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, LDL-C >100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin + ezetimibe. Most patients with ASCVD qualify.

GroupTherapyGoal
Very high riskHigh-intensity statin, ≥50% reduction COR 1; add ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 mAb COR 1; bempedoic acid 2a; inclisiran if a PCSK9 mAb cannot be used 2a<55 / <85
Not very high riskHigh-intensity statin, ≥50% COR 1; add ezetimibe, PCSK9 mAb or bempedoic acid 2a<70 / <100 (going to <55 / <85 reasonable 2a)
ASCVD + CKD stage ≥3High-intensity statin ± ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 mAb COR 1<55 / <85

ASCVD with elevated Lp(a) not at goal on maximally tolerated statin: add a PCSK9 mAb with proven cardiovascular benefit COR 1. Inclisiran has no completed outcome trial and is a second-line PCSK9 inhibitor.

Coronary artery calcium (men ≥40, women ≥45)

When to order: intermediate risk, or selected borderline risk, when the treatment decision is uncertain COR 1; intermediate or high risk when the intensity of therapy is uncertain 2a. Incidental CAC on a noncardiac CT should be factored into the decision COR 1. Not useful to “de-risk” severe hypercholesterolemia/FH, diabetes over 40, current smokers or a strong family history of premature ASCVD, and not for monitoring treatment.

CAC (AU)ActionGoal
0If the patient prefers to avoid LLT and none of the conditions above apply: reasonable to defer and repeat CAC in 3–7 years 2aLifestyle
1–99 and <75th pctModerate-intensity statin reasonable, 30–49% 2a<100 / <130
100–299 or ≥75th pctLDL-lowering therapy, statin first-line COR 1<70 / <100
300–999≥50% reduction COR 1; intensifying (higher-intensity statin, then ezetimibe, PCSK9 mAb or bempedoic acid) reasonable 2a<70 / <100; <55 / <85 reasonable
≥1000≥50% reduction, statin first-line COR 1<55 / <85

Incidental CAC on noncardiac CT: moderate-to-severe → high-intensity statin, goal <70 / <100; mild → moderate-intensity, goal <100 / <130 2a.

Severe hypercholesterolemia and FH
  • LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL: exclude and treat secondary causes, then maximally tolerated statin COR 1.
  • Not at goal on maximally tolerated statin: add ezetimibe, a PCSK9 mAb and/or bempedoic acid COR 1. Goal <100 / <130 without HeFH, additional risk factors or coronary calcium; <70 / <100 with any of these; <55 / <85 with clinical ASCVD.
  • LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin ± ezetimibe: inclisiran reasonable 2a.
  • Do not use PREVENT or other population risk tools in HeFH COR 3.
  • Panel-based genetic testing for FH when LDL-C ≥190 without a secondary cause 2a; cascade-test relatives.
  • HoFH on statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 mAb with LDL-C ≥100: evinacumab may be reasonable 2b.
Diabetes
  • Age 40–75: moderate-intensity statin, goal <100 / <130 COR 1. Multiple ASCVD risk factors: high-intensity, goal <70 / <100 2a. PREVENT ≥10% and above goal: adding ezetimibe or a PCSK9 mAb may be reasonable 2b.
  • Statin-attributed side effects: ezetimibe and/or bempedoic acid or a PCSK9 mAb COR 1.
  • Age 20–39 with T2D ≥10 y or T1D ≥20 y, albuminuria ≥30 mg/g, eGFR <60, retinopathy, neuropathy or ABI <0.9: moderate-intensity statin may be reasonable 2b. From age 30, PREVENT also applies.
  • Over 75 with life expectancy ≥2.5 years: moderate-intensity statin may be reasonable after discussion 2b.
  • On statin with LDL-C <100, TG 150–499 and additional risk factors: icosapent ethyl may be considered 2b.
Triglycerides
  • Persistent TG ≥150 mg/dL: treat secondary causes and start with lifestyle (low added sugar, less alcohol and saturated fat, exercise, 5–10% weight loss) COR 1.
  • Age 40–75 without ASCVD or diabetes, TG 150–499: use PREVENT to guide the statin discussion COR 1. Statins remain first-line for ASCVD risk when TG <1000.
  • ASCVD with LDL-C ≥55 and non-HDL-C ≥85 on maximally tolerated statin and TG 150–999: intensify LDL-lowering first COR 1.
  • Age ≥50 with ASCVD, or diabetes + ≥1 risk factor, TG 150–499 and LDL-C <100 on maximally tolerated statin: icosapent ethyl may be reasonable 2b.
  • TG 500–999, especially ≥1000 despite diet: a fibrate (fenofibrate, not gemfibrozil, with a statin) or prescription omega-3 is reasonable to lower pancreatitis risk 2a.
  • Fasting TG ≥1000: refer to a registered dietitian nutritionist COR 1; familial chylomicronemia syndrome: olezarsen with diet COR 1.
Lp(a), apoB and screening pearls
  • Measure Lp(a) at least once in every adult COR 1. Relative ASCVD risk vs the median: 1.4× at 125 nmol/L (50 mg/dL), 2× at 250 (100), 3× at 350 (150), 4× at 430 (180). Do not convert nmol/L to mg/dL — the units are not interchangeable.
  • Elevated Lp(a): early, tight control of all modifiable risk factors COR 1. Consider lipid-specialist referral at ≥200 nmol/L (≥75 mg/dL).
  • ApoB on LLT (ASCVD, CKM syndrome, type 2 diabetes, elevated TG) once LDL-C/non-HDL-C goals are met, to decide on further intensification 2a.
  • Lipid panel every 5 years from age 19; universal screening once at 9–11 years.
  • Dietary supplements are not recommended to lower LDL-C or TG COR 3.
  • Refer to a lipid specialist: suspected or confirmed FH, premature ASCVD (<40 y), not reaching ≥50% reduction and goal on statin + nonstatin therapy, side effects on ≥2 statins, Lp(a) ≥200 nmol/L, diabetes with dyslipidemia under 40.
Statin intensity (Table 6)
IntensityLDL-C ↓Examples
High≥50%Atorvastatin 40–80 mg; rosuvastatin 20–40 mg
Moderate30–49%Atorvastatin 10–20 mg; rosuvastatin 5–10 mg; simvastatin 20–40 mg; pravastatin 40–80 mg; lovastatin 40–80 mg; fluvastatin XL 80 mg; pitavastatin 1–4 mg
Low<30%Simvastatin 10 mg; pravastatin 10–20 mg; lovastatin 20 mg; fluvastatin 20–40 mg

Educational — verify doses, interactions and renal adjustment against the product label and local protocol. Simvastatin 80 mg is not recommended (myopathy).

Sources

  1. Blumenthal RS, Morris PB, Gaudino M, et al. 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia. Circulation 2026;153(17):e1154–e1276 (doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001423); co-published J Am Coll Cardiol 2026;87(19):2624–2757. Corrections: Circulation 2026;153:e1447 and 154:e393.
  2. Khan SS, Matsushita K, Sang Y, et al. Development and validation of the American Heart Association's PREVENT equations. Circulation 2024;149:430–449. Coefficients from the supplement (Table S12) as distributed in the preventr R package (Mayer M, github.com/martingmayer/preventr).
  3. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating LDL-C from the standard lipid profile. JAMA 2013;310:2061–2068.
  4. Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, et al. A new equation for calculation of LDL-C in patients with normolipidemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:540–548. Sampson M, Remaley AT, et al. Equation Calculator for LDL-C (NIH Figshare, 2020; doi:10.35092/yhjc11903274.v3) — used for test values.
  5. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of LDL cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.

Educational reference only — not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or specialist advice. Calculations run in your browser; nothing you enter is sent or stored.